Apple will allow you to inform about payments outside the App Store -apkrig

During the night from Thursday to Friday, Apple issued a statement about a planned agreement with the developers who sued the company in 2019. In their view, they did not like Apple’s monopoly behavior, the need to distribute iOS applications exclusively through the App Store and only through it. all transactions from which Apple cuts its 30 percent. It might therefore seem that Apple’s offered deal foreshadows the outcome of a player-watched dispute with Epic Games, but that would be premature, to say the least. The developers who sued Apple two years ago were Donald Cameron, the author of Lil ‘BabyNames, and Pure Sweat Basketball, the authors of the training basketball app. In neither case was it a game and the final agreement does not reflect all the original requirements of the developers.

Developers cannot use any link to other – ie external – payment options in their applications beyond e-mail addressing.

“Apple today announces a number of changes to the App Store […]”that will bring better business opportunities while maintaining the level of security and credibility of the entire market that users around the world love,” said the technology company. “The agreement clarifies that developers can alert users to additional purchasing options in their iOS apps,” sounds the most important, but this is not directly in line with what Epic wants to achieve in its dispute. Simply put, developers will now be able to use an email address – if the user agrees to do so when installing the application – and can be contacted with information that they can pay for additional content outside of Apple’s ecosystem. The advantage may be a lower price or just the convenience of choice, but so far nothing could be done by the developers.

However, as the Washington Post points out, people can no longer download iOS apps from other app stores or the web under this agreement. No other store can logically sell iOS applications. And developers can’t use any link in their applications beyond e-mail to other payment options. The amount of commission from transactions made within the App Store will not change either, so the final impact on Apple can be very small. Especially when any emails with similar offers usually end up in spam folders and people don’t respond much to them. For this reason, Apple’s approach is not very popular with people who are familiar with litigation or have their own interest in it. For example, Spotify CEO Meghan DiMuzio says Apple’s conduct is a desperate attempt to avoid court or regulators, and continues to say that Appe Music is reaping benefits that Spotify does not receive.

So if the agreement is fulfilled, it could potentially open the way to something else, but the dispute with Epic Games is much more serious.

Again, this brings us to the fundamental questions of the extent to which Apple, as the operator, can dictate the terms and the extent to which its size and importance force it to apply the general rules of equal competition. It must also be acknowledged that the agreement is potentially the biggest change Apple would have made, and no confirmation must be left that a $ 100 million fund will be set up to support small developers in the US and also confirms that it will no longer push for the pricing of applications or their additions, which have yet to end Baťov 99 cents. So if the agreement is fulfilled, it could potentially pave the way for something else, but the dispute with Epic Games is much more serious and the demands of the developers are incomparably greater. Epic demands that secondary payment options can be offered directly in games, calls for a reduction in the current 30 percent commission, wants to avoid any disadvantage to applications released outside the App Store, and efforts to launch its own gaming store within the App Store. This dispute should be resolved by the end of this year.